<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ramblings.ajaxed.net/2009/12/14/so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ramblings.ajaxed.net/2009/12/14/so/</link>
	<description>And this is how it happened</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://ramblings.ajaxed.net/2009/12/14/so/comment-page-1/#comment-15883</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ramblings.ajaxed.net/?p=372#comment-15883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And to think it was preparing a document.&quot; huh huh huh ... tech_docs types are very usually deprecated with impunity. But actually project management is, to a very large part, a matter of documentation.

I got a crack at a major &quot;document&quot; when I was still young enough to survive the process. (I think 2.5 yrs of 60hr weeks would do me serious damage, now.) A very sweet avionics R&amp;D project seriously in the ditch ... almost 15 man-years of efforts (more?) had resulted in a huge inchoate mess. And the MIL-SPEC deliverable consisted of a) a 3 volume set (executive summary, user&#039;s manual, and installation) and b) change management of all hardware and software documents. Herding cats? I had to herd cats ... something like 150 cats, including Detailed Design Documents. Herculean effort. I was 2wks late (on a 7yr contract) and under budget. *shrug*

Most people are allergic to _techne_ ... and most managers have learned to avoid _praxis_ like the plague. Both groups have appreciated that BS and personality politics are more reliable tactics when it comes to careerism.
#opportunism #matrix #borg huh huh huh

cheers!
@bentrem]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And to think it was preparing a document.&#8221; huh huh huh &#8230; tech_docs types are very usually deprecated with impunity. But actually project management is, to a very large part, a matter of documentation.</p>
<p>I got a crack at a major &#8220;document&#8221; when I was still young enough to survive the process. (I think 2.5 yrs of 60hr weeks would do me serious damage, now.) A very sweet avionics R&amp;D project seriously in the ditch &#8230; almost 15 man-years of efforts (more?) had resulted in a huge inchoate mess. And the MIL-SPEC deliverable consisted of a) a 3 volume set (executive summary, user&#8217;s manual, and installation) and b) change management of all hardware and software documents. Herding cats? I had to herd cats &#8230; something like 150 cats, including Detailed Design Documents. Herculean effort. I was 2wks late (on a 7yr contract) and under budget. *shrug*</p>
<p>Most people are allergic to _techne_ &#8230; and most managers have learned to avoid _praxis_ like the plague. Both groups have appreciated that BS and personality politics are more reliable tactics when it comes to careerism.<br />
#opportunism #matrix #borg huh huh huh</p>
<p>cheers!<br />
@bentrem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
